Improve DevOps Process Flow
Tas Skoudros
What It Means and How To Do It
Software delivery slows when work stalls in queues, handoffs, and approvals. “Improve flow” is the heuristic that asks: How do we reduce friction from idea to running, observable software? This post gives a practical playbook: map your value stream, shrink batch sizes, cut WIP, eliminate handoffs, automate the path to production, and instrument the system so bottlenecks are obvious and fixable.
What we mean by “flow”
Flow is the speed and smoothness with which a change moves from idea → code → production → customer feedback. When flow is healthy, work doesn’t sit in queues, and engineers can ship small, safe updates frequently.
Quick signs you have a flow problem
Lead time feels long. If a small change takes days to reach production, you’re waiting somewhere.
Work piles up. Many open pull requests (PRs) or half-done tickets signal too much Work-in-Progress (WIP).
Too many handoffs. If a change needs multiple teams or approvals, queues appear.
Unclear next step. If an engineer has to ask “what now?” the path isn’t paved.
Seven practical moves (with plain-English explanations)
Map the value stream
What: Draw the steps from “ready to develop” to “running live”, including where work waits. Why: You can’t fix what you can’t see. The longest waits usually hide in testing environments and reviews. Example: A team discovered PRs sat 18 hours before review; auto-assigning reviewers cut this to 3 hours.
Limit WIP
What: Set a visible cap on how many items a person or team can have in progress (e.g., 2–3 each). Why: Less juggling ⇒ faster finishes and fewer forgotten PRs. Example: With a team WIP limit of 8, engineers swarmed blocked items instead of starting new ones.
Shrink batch sizes
What: Prefer small PRs (a few hundred lines), feature flags, and short-lived branches (“trunk-based development”). Why: Small changes are easier to review, test, and roll back. Risk per deploy drops. Example: Breaking one 1,500-line PR into five PRs cut review time from 2 days to 2 hours total.
Automate a “golden path” to production
What: Make the standard way to ship a change automated and auditable; build, test, security scans, deploy. Why: Engineers shouldn’t chase people or tickets to ship. Automation reduces waiting and mistakes. Example: A repo template added CI, security checks, and a one-click deploy; new services shipped same day.
Secure by Design: Policy checks (licences, dependency risks, IaC rules) run automatically, so security is built-in rather than a late-stage gate.
Collapse handoffs with platform capabilities
What: Turn common operations into self-service tools: “create service”, “request access”, “deploy safely”. Why: Each removed handoff removes a queue. Example: A “create service” script bootstrapped repo, CI, SLOs, and permissions in 5 minutes.
Make waiting times observable
What: Track a few metrics: lead time for change, PR cycle time, deployment frequency, and where items sit idle. Why: If you measure the queues, you’ll fix the biggest one first. Example: A weekly chart showed test environment waits were 40% of lead time—ephemeral envs solved it.
Replace blanket approvals with risk-based controls
What: Pre-approve low-risk changes; require extra checks only for high-risk areas. Why: You keep assurance without turning every deploy into a meeting. Example: Low-risk PRs auto-deployed behind flags; CAB reviewed only high-impact changes monthly.
A short, concrete before/after
Starting point (Team Alpha):
Lead time (commit → prod): 3.5 days
Deployment frequency: weekly
PR cycle time (open → merge): 26 hours
30 days later (two changes: smaller PRs + auto-assigned reviewers):
Lead time: 1.2 days
Deployment frequency: 3–5 per week
PR cycle time: 5–6 hours
Change failure rate: unchanged (safer, smaller changes)
Minimal metrics that matter
Lead time for change – how long a typical change takes to reach customers.
Deployment frequency – how often you release.
PR cycle time – open to merge.
Change failure rate – % of deployments that cause incidents/rollbacks.
MTTR – time to recover when something does go wrong.
If lead time falls and failure rate doesn’t rise, your flow is improving safely.
Glossary (plain English)
WIP (Work-in-Progress): Items currently being worked on. Too much WIP slows everything.
Batch size: How big each change is. Smaller is safer and faster.
Trunk-based development: Short-lived branches merged to main frequently.
Feature flag: A switch to turn features on/off without redeploying.
Golden path (paved road): The default, automated way to ship a change.
Canary release: Deploy to a small percentage first; roll back if issues appear.
Flow efficiency: Active work time ÷ total time (including waiting).
DORA metrics: Industry measures of delivery performance (lead time, deploy frequency, change failure rate, MTTR).
CAB: Change Advisory Board—traditional approval meeting; often replaced by automated, risk-based checks.
How Stacktrack helps (outcomes, not tools)
DevOps as a service: Provides expertise to get ahead of your DevOps Process Flows.
Refinery: Standardises the golden path, templates new services, and streamlines reviews.
Identity: Centralises access with least-privilege roles and short-lived credentials.
Secure by Design: Controls and evidence are automated from day one.
Understand your current state and get a tailored improvement plan.
Our customers highly rate us.
